Most Wikipedia pages don't fail because they're badly written. They fail because nobody checked notability first. We test your case against Wikipedia's actual sourcing requirements and give you a straight answer before you spend anything on a page.
Notability is the single biggest reason Wikipedia pages get rejected or deleted — not tone, not formatting, but a lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Checking this before writing costs a fraction of what it costs to write, submit and lose a page that was never going to qualify.
We assess against the actual notability guideline for your subject's category, not a general rule of thumb.
Every piece of coverage is checked for independence, reliability and depth before it counts toward your case.
We say “not yet” as often as we say “yes” — a false pass wastes your money later.
You receive a written report showing exactly what qualifies and what's missing, source by source.
Send us what coverage you already have. We'll tell you where it stands.
Notability isn't one test — it's several, applied together. Here's exactly what gets checked before we tell you whether a page is realistic.
A full check of your subject against Wikipedia's general notability guideline and any subject-specific criteria that apply — people, companies, or organizations.
Every piece of existing coverage is catalogued and matched against what Wikipedia actually accepts as an independent, reliable source.
We check depth, not just quantity — a single paragraph mention doesn't carry the same weight as significant, sustained coverage.
Your case is measured against the specific notability standard for your category, since the bar differs for athletes, academics and businesses.
We flag anything likely to draw extra scrutiny — promotional sourcing, conflict-of-interest issues, or past failed attempts at a page.
You get a written verdict: ready to proceed, close but missing specific sourcing, or not yet realistic — with reasons either way.
The same sequence runs every time, because skipping a step is how a false “yes” gets handed out.
We gather background on the subject and what coverage already exists publicly.
01Independent sources are located and verified across news, trade and academic outlets.
02Coverage is sorted by depth, independence and reliability against Wikipedia's own standards.
03Findings are compiled into a clear, source-by-source notability report you can act on.
04We walk you through the verdict and, where relevant, what's still missing.
05Report delivered, with a clear next step whether that's writing, waiting, or walking away.
06
A notability check protects you from the two most expensive outcomes on Wikipedia: paying for a page that gets deleted, and drawing negative attention to your name in the process. Deleted pages leave a visible trace in Wikipedia's logs, and repeated attempts without addressing the underlying sourcing gap tend to make the next attempt harder, not easier.
Getting a clear answer upfront means every dollar spent afterward — on writing, sourcing, or submission — goes toward a page that has a real chance of staying live.
One honest assessment now saves months of back-and-forth later.
Notability standards differ by category — here's how we've applied them across six kinds of subjects.
Private individuals assessed against the general notability guideline, using press coverage, awards and independent recognition.
Businesses checked against organizational notability criteria — sustained trade and news coverage, not funding announcements alone.
Political and civic figures assessed under stricter sourcing standards given the scrutiny these pages typically attract.
Academics, doctors and executives measured against field-specific notability markers like citations, awards and appointments.
Sports notability checked against competition level, records and coverage in recognized sports media.
Notability assessed via chart history, label releases, touring record and independent music press coverage.
Send your background and we'll give you a first-pass reaction at no cost.
Every assessment comes as a report you can keep, reference, or share.
A “not yet” verdict is delivered plainly, with no push to buy anyway.
Different standards for individuals, companies, athletes and public figures, applied correctly.
We built this service because too many clients came to us after paying someone else to write a page that was deleted within a day — for a notability problem nobody checked first. An assessment costs far less than a failed page, and it tells you the truth before you commit to anything.
Notability is the gate every Wikipedia page has to pass through, and it's the part most people get wrong — either overestimating how much coverage they have, or underestimating what actually counts. Our mission is to give you that answer honestly, whether or not it's the one you were hoping for.
A page built on real notability doesn't just get published — it survives scrutiny for years. That's the only outcome worth working toward.
Address
7234 W North Ave Ste 208, Chicago, IL 60707, US
Professional Wiki Help is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation. We provide independent consultancy services and operate in accordance with Wikipedia's Terms of Use, including its paid-contribution disclosure requirements. A notability assessment reflects our professional judgment based on current guidelines and does not guarantee that a page will be approved, published, or remain live.
